Analysis of Economic Growth and Per ca pita GDP of South Asian countries
Introduction:-
Amid lockdown, due
to COVID-19, there are lots of talks of its impacts on economic growth. The
economic growth and per capita GDP are two important indicators in the economy.
It is vital to understand them as they can be confusing concerning other
indicators. The most common confusion is the GDP and % growth of GDP which are
two different indicators. Gross domestic product is defined as the total
production within the boundary of the nation. Which is different than the GNP
which deals with the ownership
India, Sri Lanka,
and Bangladesh are neighboring countries and share demographic and
socio-economical similarities
Bangladesh shares
similarities with India as it is a neighbor to the West Bengal state of the
country. Sri Lanka has the similarity with the south Indian states and but the the way these 3 countries have decided to deal with their economic decisions, is
different and will further describe in the analysis results.
Methodology:
The data here used
has been taken from the World bank site the most popular indicators and were
filtered through the % of economic growth and Per capita income in the excel
sheet. Data from 2000 to 2015 has been taken under doing the time series
analysis in chart form by using excel and results have been concluded from the
various articles and books of academic importance.
Time-series Analysis:

The first chart is of the GDP per capita of
all the three countries which is in US$ as per the standardization. Grossly all
three countries have the trend of increasing the per capita for 15 years but
the proportion is different. Sri Lanka is showing higher growth at the same
time when compared to India and Bangladesh but during 2008 and 2010 the income has
been unstable and changing frequently. India has relatively slow and steady
growth with higher income in 2007 and between 2010 and 2011. Bangladesh has the
lowest per capita income even though it started as same as India from 2000 to
2002 but after that India’s income has increase but Bangladesh has been lower
and consistent.
2) Comparison of economic growth:
When we see the
per capita income side by side with the Comparison of GDP the patterns are way
different even though the Per capita Income has been arriving from the GDP.
That is because of the % growth in GDP which is different than the GDP itself.
As it is mentioned in the Introduction that % of economic growth can below and
high and still not have any impact on per capita income as it is derived from
GDP itself.
The graph is showing various trends in all
3 countries. Shri Lanka is showing a downfall in 2001 and rising sharply in 2002
and the graph is almost stabilizing between 4 to 8% before once again falling in 2009. India and
Sri Lanka is following a similar trend from 2008 to 2013 but it is happening
in different years. But Bangladesh is not following the drastic changes and it
is consistently between 4% to 6% throughout 15 years.
Discussion:
As the % growth of GDP per year is directly
depends on the factor which affects the GDP
Also in India as well as the Bangladesh and
Sri Lanka imbalance between poverty and economy is the common factor in the
economic growth as well as the per capita income. As it was mentioned in the
introduction per capita income is more sufficient but if the country is
suffering from the rich and poor ratio which is skewed it can be misleading in
terms of outlier effects of the rich’s total income. Increase the level of per
capita consumption the demand for better quality and more processed agriculture
has also increased and including on the rise. Also in India, most of the
transactions happened by the cash and not bank which are not registered as the
daily wagers. So big chunk goes under this as well as the black market. With
GST the contribution to GDP has increased which is showing the increase in
economic growth too.
Bangladesh has an interesting story as that
it is dominated by foreign aid and its effects on economic growth has
always been questioned
Sri Lanka has the story connected with the being
an interesting case of the developing country which has quite high social
progress in comparison to their per capita income level
To understand 2001’s negative GDP growth is
that the private investment which was anyways declining since the mid-1990s
contracted sharply the first time in 2001.
The fall of the collation government after 2000 was responsible for
reform orientation and business-friendly government in 2001 which helped in
rising growth till 2006. After that the overall fiscal deficit ratio reduced
from 9.9% GDP to 5.5% of GDP by 2017 which cannot be seen in the graph as the
data is only showing till 2015
This analysis helps understand the various
factors and conditions which do not seem economically valuable but can have a
big impact on the same.
References:
6 Main Factors
Affecting GDP.
(n.d.). Retrieved March 31, 2020, from http://www.economicsdiscussion.net/gdp/6-main-factors-affecting-gdp/15344
Ahamad, M.,
policy, A. I.-E., & 2011, undefined. (n.d.). Electricity consumption and
economic growth nexus in Bangladesh: Revisited evidences. Elsevier.
Retrieved April 2, 2020, from
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421511005374
Anoruo, E., &
Ramchander, S. (1998). Current account and fiscal deficits: Evidence from five
developing economies of Asia. Journal of Asian Economics, 9(3),
487–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1049-0078(99)80099-2
Bashar, O. K. M.
R., & Khan, H. (2012). Liberalization and Growth: An Econometric Study of
Bangladesh. SSRN Electronic Journal.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1601609
Factors affecting
GDP of India.
(n.d.). Retrieved March 31, 2020, from
http://www.educationjournal.org/archives/2018/vol3/issue2/3-2-25
Ghosh, S. (2018).
India: nutrition intake and economic growth, a causality analysis. Development
Studies Research, 5(1), 69–82.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2018.1468791
Global financial
crisis: Lessons for India from the 2008 crisis and beyond | Business Standard
News.
(n.d.). Retrieved April 2, 2020, from
https://www.business-standard.com/article/markets/global-financial-crisis-lessons-for-india-from-the-2008-crisis-and-beyond-118091001256_1.html
Jain, D., Sanal
Nair, K., & Jain, V. (2015). Factors Affecting GDP (Manufacturing,
Services, Industry): An Indian Perspective. Pune Annual Research Journal of
Symbiosis Centre for Management Studies, Pune, 3, 39.
Razzaque, A.,
Khondker, B. H., Ahmed, N., & Mujeri, M. K. (2003). MIMAP-Bangladesh Micro
Impacts of Macroeconomic and Adjustment Policies in Bangladesh Trade
Liberalisation and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence on Bangladesh Trade
Liberalization and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence on Bangladesh. In idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org.
https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/bitstream/handle/10625/31979/118892.pdf
Sri Lanka Per
Capita Income Higher Than India But GDP Growth Rate Lower: World Bank. (n.d.).
Retrieved April 1, 2020, from
https://www.bloombergquint.com/economy-finance/india-sri-lanka-gdp-growth-rate-per-capita-income-economy-world-bank
The Great
Recession and India’s trade collapse | VOX, CEPR Policy Portal. (n.d.).
Retrieved April 2, 2020, from https://voxeu.org/article/great-recession-and-india-s-trade-collapse
Weerakoon, D.,
Kumar, U., & Dime, R. (2019). Sri Lanka’s Macroeconomic Challenges: A
Tale of Two Deficits (SWP No. 63). 63.
https://doi.org/10.22617/WPS190024-2
Comments
Post a Comment